HR-4197: A bill that enables mediocrity
Over the recent Thanksgiving holiday, I decided to take some time to review the recent piece of legislation introduced by the Congressional Black Caucus entitled The Hurricane Katrina Recovery, Reclamation, Restoration, Reconstruction and Reunion Act of 2005 (HR-4197). I’ll just give you some of the highlights that stuck out to me. If you wish to read the bill in its entirety, click here.
Here is a line from the bill that I found interesting:
“…many of the hardest hit areas in New Orleans and the Gulf Coast from Hurricane Katrina were low-income and minority communities already facing decades of environmental injustices;”
This statement is very misleading. If one was to rely on the foxhole Katrina coverage (”foxhole” meaning that networks focused most of their time on the city of New Orleans not the other counties that were also affected) it would be very easy to conclude that blacks were the biggest victims in this unfortunate disaster. The facts tell us a different story.
Below, you will find a chart that illustrates the white vs. black makeup of affected counties/parishes:
Whites were far more affected by Katrina than blacks.
|
Parish or county
|
White
|
Black
|
| Jefferson,
La. |
69.8%
|
22.9%
|
| Orleans,
La. |
28.1%
|
67.3%
|
| Plaquemines,
La. |
69.8%
|
23.4%
|
| St.
Bernard, La. |
88.3%
|
7.6%
|
| St.
Tammany, La. |
87.0%
|
9.9%
|
| Hancock,
Miss. |
90.2%
|
6.8%
|
| Harrison,
Miss. |
73.1%
|
21.1%
|
| Jackson,
Miss. |
75.4%
|
20.9%
|
{data taken from census.gov. Chart format is from James Taranto’ article “Is Katrina Racist?” in OpinionJournal.com–part of the Wall Street Journal}
This bill also seeks to “restart” the Head Start program:
PART 4–WAIVER AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE HEAD START SERVICES
SEC. 541. WAIVER AUTHORITY TO EXPAND THE AVAILABILITY OF HEAD START SERVICES.
The Head Start program has had its share of problems as it relates to financial oversight and poor management. Here are a couple of articles that provide some additional information:
Stronger oversight urged for Head Start programs
By Cheryl Wetzstein
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
Hundreds of Head Start preschool programs have financial irregularities, a government watchdog agency says in calling for tougher oversight of the 40-year-old anti-poverty program.
Between 2000 and 2003, 838 Head Start grantees were found to have one or more errors in the way they managed their program, finances or bookkeeping, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) said in a report released today.
“The next time those grantees were reviewed, 440 — or 53 percent — were cited again for problems in those same areas,” the GAO report said.
These findings, plus other evidence of mismanagement, show that the Department of Health and Human Services’ Administration for Children and Families (ACF) “has not implemented a well-integrated monitoring system to oversee the Head Start program, including its financial management,” the GAO said. Without change, the report added, “ACF will be unable to ascertain how widespread the problems are.” (more…)
So this department admits to widespread problems, but is unable to measure just how widespread these problems are in the Head Start program. This bill seeks to expand this program without any mention of a reliable system of checks and balances to ensure that the money goes to its intended source. Here is an excerpt from the actual GAO report:
Moreover, when we looked more closely at each of the processes ACF uses to oversee Head Start grantees, we identified flaws that limit the quality, accuracy, and reliability of the information ACF collects. ACF does not ensure that its on-site reviews are conducted in accordance with its own guidelines for grantee compliance; it does not verify the accuracy of the data grantees submit on key performance indicators each year; and it does not reconcile grantees’ actual withdrawals with reported expenditures until all the funds have been spent. In addition, many of the staff we spoke with said that they often learn about problems after they get calls from parents and teachersâ€â€an ad-hoc, reactive approach on which ACF relies too heavily instead of comprehensive, proactive risk assessment. (more…*.pdf)
The watchdog group Citizens Against Public Waste also came up with some additional findings [Link]
This bill also seeks to pour in money into the historically failing school system in New Orleans. Again, there is no mention of a way to ensure taxpayers that the proposed funding will not just simply restart failure. Again, here are some more excerpts that shed more light on the school situation before and after Katrina:
NEW ORLEANS SCHOOLS BEFORE AND AFTER KATRINA (PBS)
November 1, 2005
JOHN MERROW: It had other problems besides decrepit buildings. New Orleans, the nation’s 50th largest public school system with nearly 60,000 students, had earned a reputation for incompetence and dishonesty.
JIMMY FAHRENHOLTZ: Fraud, corruption, contract scams, flat-out theft, people walking out with laptops, anything you can imagine. Any way you could steal they were doing it.
JOHN MERROW: Since 2002, there have been 24 indictments against school employees. $71 million in federal money was unaccounted for, and there were other problems. Academically, New Orleans was one of the worst public school systems in the country. 70 percent of the eighth graders were not proficient in math, 74 percent in English. Under pressure from the state because of the academic performance and in danger of going bankrupt, the school board acted. It hired a company that specializes in turning around failing organizations. They arrived in New Orleans in July.
JOHN MERROW: What did you find?
BILL ROBERTI: Just years and years and years of abuse, and of people just doing what they wanted to do. I mean there was — there was no discipline. (more…)
School Accountability Accounting
by Neal McCluskey
May 8, 2005
Neal McCluskey is a Cato Institute education fellow.
An April 12 Associated Press article about New Orleans school superintendent Anthony Amato’s resignation noted Mr. Amato was leaving “after more than two stormy years in the post, during which the school system lost millions of dollars, federal officials investigated allegations of corruption and test scores remained among the worst in the state.” In Mr. Amato’s defense, the article noted financial problems and corruption were rampant long before he arrived in the Big Easy. (more…)
Crises multiply at schools in New Orleans
By Adam Nossiter
April 19, 2005
The Associated Press
NEW ORLEANS  Dozens of employees indicted or convicted on corruption charges. Tens of millions of dollars unaccounted for. Eight superintendents in seven years. Rock-bottom test scores. Shootings, sirens and police uniforms, often. The threat of bankruptcy and bounced checks, constantly.
In the dismal gallery of failing urban school systems, New Orleans’ may be the biggest horror of them all. (more…)
On top of all of this, this bill is pushing for expedited teacher recruitment:
SEC. 558. EXPEDITED APPLICATIONS FOR TEACHER RECRUITMENT GRANTS.
As I mention earlier, this bill seriously lacks a thorough system of checks and balances to ensure both the intended recipients and taxpayers that the money will be properly spent. Both the city of New Orleans and the state of Louisiana have a long history of corruption and shady financial mismanagement. There were other sections of this bill that bear closer scrutiny by the public at larger. Again, I just wanted to highlight my own observations.
While I believe that the United States does have an obligation to rebuild this region, throwing our money into proven failed systems is very unwise and not the way to do it.

Legislation such as this one is what keeps many of the member of the CBC in office. National calamities or misfortune create the high vilsibility “victims” that these politicians need to do some soap-box grandstanding.
Anyone with a brain would know that Louisiana has one of the highest poverty rates in the country as a state. It just so happens that most of the poor in the urban New Orleans are Black, which is the case of most cities. Nothing is said of the poor whites, but I guess they should go out and get a few self-appointed gate-keepers too.
But the CBC longed signed on to the vote buying schemes that are social programs. I have always said the elderly, the handicapped, and children should be the only one receiveing any aid, outside of unemployment benefits. Look at Democratic controlled infratructures like city education, public works systems, city contracts, etc. You will find in all almost all cases, those that are entrusted with the mean and power to oversee the services that are for the poor “Blacks”, are often the ones guilty of malfeasance or incompetence.
Comment by Chris Gill | November 28, 2005
I’m not sure what your point is here. It’s not the CBC’s job to ferret out corruption. Now if you want to the CBC to not fund pre-schoolers and school children because some of the people in charge of their schools are crooks, that’s anothe thing.
By the way, I’ve noticed that although I’ve featured your blog in the Black Bloggers Assn for over a year, you don’t include the BBA in your blog.
You even have a Miami Cuban-American blog, Afro-Mexican, and Kenyan listing, but no BBA.
Might we know why?
ricland
Comment by ricland | November 28, 2005
It’s not the CBC’s job to ferret out corruption.
Oooookay, so then its their job to fund it?
By the way, I’ve noticed that although I’ve featured your blog in the Black Bloggers Assn for over a year, you don’t include the BBA in your blog. (for other readers, this is not the first time this commentor has left this kind of comment on this site)
Ahhh, this is the reason for all the hatin’ on your part. I kinda figured as much, but I wanted you to say it first.
#1. As far as your baseless accusation goes, please check out this link. (Dated March 10th 2005).
#2. Look under Mo’ Blogs. Your link has been there for MONTHS (At least since March of this year)!
If you wish to comment on any posting on this site, I kindly ask that you would stay on the issue being discussed. I have an e-mail address if you wish to communicate anything beyond that.
Comment by Duane | November 28, 2005
“were low-income and minority communities already facing decades of environmental injustices;—
John L: “low-income and minority: means the same thing when people say “low-income and minority “regarding the achivement gap: poor whites and poor Blacks.” So where is it misleading, Duane?!
Comment by John Lindsay | November 28, 2005