| Subcribe via RSS

This is the first I have heard of this

March 24th, 2008 Posted in Uncategorized


Blacks ‘Injected’ With Syphilis? Never Happened
David Mills
The Huffington Post

[excerpt]

In the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male,” federal researchers refused to treat a group of black men who already had syphilis, long after a cure had been found.

Instead, doctors treated these men like laboratory animals, studying the course of the disease over decades.

The Tuskegee experiment was the most shameful episode in the history of the U.S. Public Health Service. President Bill Clinton apologized on behalf of the nation in 1997.

But the government did not infect black men with syphilis.

To invoke the Tuskegee experiment to suggest that the government invented AIDS to kill black people, as Rev. Wright did… that dishonors the truth. There is no excuse for it. It must stop. (more…)

====

Of course Mills already grabbed my attention with the title alone, so I decided to follow the CDC link that he provided in his piece. Again, here is an excerpt (This has more to do with Rev. Wright comments).

U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee
CDC

In 1932, the Public Health Service, working with the Tuskegee Institute, began a study to record the natural history of syphilis in hopes of justifying treatment programs for blacks. It was called the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male.”

The study initially involved 600 black men – 399 with syphilis, 201 who did not have the disease. The study was conducted without the benefit of patients’ informed consent. Researchers told the men they were being treated for “bad blood,” a local term used to describe several ailments, including syphilis, anemia, and fatigue. In truth, they did not receive the proper treatment needed to cure their illness. In exchange for taking part in the study, the men received free medical exams, free meals, and burial insurance. Although originally projected to last 6 months, the study actually went on for 40 years.

What Went Wrong?

In July 1972, an Associated Press story about the Tuskegee Study caused a public outcry that led the Assistant Secretary for Health and Scientific Affairs to appoint an Ad Hoc Advisory Panel to review the study. The panel had nine members from the fields of medicine, law, religion, labor, education, health administration, and public affairs.

The panel found that the men had agreed freely to be examined and treated. However, there was no evidence that researchers had informed them of the study or its real purpose. In fact, the men had been misled and had not been given all the facts required to provide informed consent.

The men were never given adequate treatment for their disease. Even when penicillin became the drug of choice for syphilis in 1947, researchers did not offer it to the subjects. The advisory panel found nothing to show that subjects were ever given the choice of quitting the study, even when this new, highly effective treatment became widely used. (more…)

While this information still does not let the U.S. government off the hook for not treating these men, it does blow a HUGE hole in the theory that Syphilis was injected in the Black community.

Related:

Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male (Wikipedia)

3 Responses to “This is the first I have heard of this”

  1. DarkStar Says:

    OK, I’m not in a good mood today, but who the hell says Blacks were INJECTED with it? EVERYTHING I’ve heard has been clear to state that Blacks got it “the normal way” but they were never treated.

    Something tells me this is a devious slight of hand and someone needs to be pimp smacked for it.


  2. Duane Says:

    Well for starters if you follow the first link, Mills gives a short list of folks (besides Wright) who have repeated this assertion recently. Personally, I know I have heard it repeated regularly and have seen it unchecked for years.


  3. GLoria Says:

    Well does it not follow that the community was injected because these men with communicable diseases were not abstinent and were not informed that they could pass the disease on to their partners and so on and so forth?


Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the answer to the math equation shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the equation.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam equation